Conservation Evidence: Evidence Data

8866 Studies found

Studies

An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.

Review the associated Actions

About studies Sources of evidence

8866 Studies found

Refine

Hide

Refine

Keywords

Action type

Country

8866 Studies found

Order results by:

Sort by:

	Study	Published
	North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands Based on: Rochefort L., Quinty F., Campeau S., Johnson K. & Malterer T. (2003). Study Link	2003
	North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) Based on: Weir L.A. & Mossman M.J. (2005) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species, University of California Press, 307–313. Study Link	2005
	Nonlethal techniques for managing predation: primary and secondary repellents Based on: Shivik J.A., Treves A. & Callahan P. (2003). Study Link	2003
	Nongame wildlife responses to chaining of pinyon-juniper woodlands Based on: O'Meara T.E., Haufler J.B., Stelter L.H. & Nagy J.G. (1981). Study Link	1981
	Nonequilibrium dynamics of sedge meadows grazed by cattle in southern Wisconsin Based on: Middleton B. (2002). Study Link	2002
	Non‐lethal management of carnivore predation: long‐term tests with a startle reflex‐based deterrence system on a fish farm Based on: Götz T. & Janik V.M. (2016). Study Link	2016
	Non-target species mortality and the measurement of brodifacoum rodenticide residues after a rat (Rattus rattus) eradication on Palmyra Atoll, tropical Pacific Based on: Pitt W.C., Berentsen A.R., Shiels A.B., Volker S.F., Eisemann J.D., Wegmann A.S. & Howald G.R. (2015). Study Link	2015
	Non-target insects in unsprayed cereal edges and aphid dispersal to the adjacent crop Based on: de Snoo G.R. & deLeeuw J. (1996). Study Link	1996
	*Non-target impacts of forest defoliator management options: Decision for no spraying may have worse impacts on non-target Lepidoptera than Bacillus thuringiensis* insecticides** Based on: Scriber J.M. (2004). Study Link	2004
	Non-target effects of the 'push-pull' habitat management strategy: parasitoid activity and soil fauna abundance Based on: Midega C.A.O., Khan Z.R., Van den Berg J., Ogol C.K.P.O., Bruce T.J. & Pickett J.A. (2009). Study Link	2009
	*Non-target effects of grass-specific herbicides differ among species, chemicals and host plants in Euphydryas* butterflies** Based on: Schultz C.B., Zemaitis J.L., Thomas C.C., Bowers M.D. & Crone E.E. (2016). Study Link	2016
	Non-native species newsletter: spring edition Based on: Environment Agency Invasive Species Action Group . (2014) Environment Agency Invasive Species Action Group report, 4. Study Link	2014
	Non-native fish introductions and the decline of the mountain yellow-legged frog from within protected areas Based on: Knapp R. A & Matthews K. (2000). Study Link	2000
	Non-lethal efforts to deter shark predation of Hawaiian monk seal pups Based on: Gobush K.S. & Farry S.C. (2012). Study Link	2012
	Non-lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles Based on: Baker S.E., Ellwood S.A., Watkins R., & Macdonald D.W. (2005). Study Link	2005
	Non-inversion tillage and farmland birds: a review with special reference to the UK and Europe Based on: Cunningham H.M., Chaney K., Bradbury R.B. & Wilcox A. (2004). Study Link	2004
	Non-commercial invertebrate discards in an experimental trammel net fishery Based on: Gonçalves J.M.S., Bentes L., Coelho R., Monteiro P., Ribeiro J., Correia C., Lino P.G. & Erzini K. (2008). Study Link	2008
	Noah's Ark for the threatened Elkhorn coral Acropora palmata Based on: Petersen D., Laterveer M., Carl M., Borneman E., Brittsan M., Hagedorn M. & Schick M. (2008). Study Link	2008
	No-tillage and manure applications increase aggregation and improve nutrient retention in a sandy-loam soil Based on: Jiao Y., Whalen J.K. & Hendershot W.H. (2006). Study Link	2006
	No-tillage and high-residue practices reduce soil water evaporation Based on: Mitchell J.P., Singh P.N., Wallender W.W., Munk D.S., Wroble J.F., Horwath W.R., Hogan P., Roy R. & Hanson B.R. (2012). Study Link	2012
	No-take marine reserves increase abundance and biomass of reef fish on inshore fringing reefs of the Great Barrier Reef Based on: Williamson D.H., Russ G.R. & Ayling A.M. (2004). Study Link	2004
	No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean Based on: Sala E. & Giakoumi S. (2018). Study Link	2018
	No trespassing: using a biofence to manipulate wolf movements Based on: Ausband D.E., Mitchell M.S., Bassing S.B. & White C. (2013). Study Link	2013
	No place like home: An experimental comparison of reintroduction strategies using snakes Based on: Roe J.H., Frank M.R., Gibson S.E., Attum O. & Kingsbury B.A. (2010). Study Link	2010
	*No paternal genetic integration in desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) following translocation into an existing population* Based on: Mulder K.P., Walde A.D., Boarman W.I., Woodman A.P., Latch E.K. & Fleischer R.C. (2017). Study Link	2017

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.