xxxx TEST

Overall effectiveness category Evidence not assessed
Number of studies: 1
Share Tweet Email

View assessment score

How is the evidence assessed?

Effectiveness

not assessed
Certainty

not assessed
Harms

not assessed

Calculating overall effectiveness category

Background information and definitions

xxxx

Study locations

Key messages

xxxx

About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

ksdfuaygwfoabeoic
Study and other actions tested
Referenced paper
Smith R.S. & Rushton S.P. (1994) The effects of grazing management on the vegetation of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in northern England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 13-24.

Please cite as:

Smith, R.K., Meredith, H. & Sutherland, W.J. (2020) Amphibian Conservation. Pages 9-64 in: W.J. Sutherland, L.V. Dicks, S.O. Petrovan & R.K. Smith (eds) What Works in Conservation 2020. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK.

Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Amphibian Conservation

Related Actions

Actions	Effectiveness	Studies	Category
xxxx TEST Action Link	Evidence not assessed	1	Synopsis Link
Engage volunteers to collect amphibian data (citizen science) Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	7	Synopsis Link
Provide education programmes about amphibians Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	6	Synopsis Link