Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.
Review the associated Actions
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
0 selected |
|
Study | Published | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
Correlates of success for on-site releases of nuisance black bears in Great Smoky Mountains National Park Based on: Clark J.E., van Manen F.T. & Pelton M.R. (2002). Study Link |
2002 | 1 | |
Bells reduce predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus) Based on: Ruxton G.D., Thomas S. & Wright J.W. (2002). Study Link |
2002 | 1 | |
Efficacy of translocation to control urban deer in Missouri: costs, efficiency, and outcome Based on: Beringer J., Hansen L.P., Demand J.A., Sartwell J., Wallendorf M. & Mange R. (2002). Study Link |
2002 | 1 | |
Live-capture and small-scale relocation of urban deer on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina Based on: Cromwell J.A., Warren R.J. & Henderson D.W. (1999). Study Link |
1999 | 1 | |
Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem Based on: Blanchard B.M. & Knight R.R. (1995). Study Link |
1995 | 1 | |
Post-translocation survival and movements of metropolitan white-tailed deer Based on: Jones J.M. & Witham J.H. (1990). Study Link |
1990 | 1 | |
Field tests of potential polar bear repellents Based on: Miller G.D. (1987). Study Link |
1987 | 1 | |
An electric fence to deter polar bears Based on: Davies J.C. & Rockwell R.F. (1986). Study Link |
1986 | 1 | |
Homing of transplanted Alaskan brown bears Based on: Miller S. & Ballard W. (1982). Study Link |
1982 | 1 |
0 selected |
|
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseAn online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continueFields with * are required.