Conservation Evidence: Evidence Data

44 Studies found

Studies

An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.

Review the associated Actions

About studies Sources of evidence

44 Studies found

Refine

Hide

Refine

Keywords

Habitat

Artificial Habitats
Forest & Woodland
Wetlands

Threat

Action type

Land/water protection
Species management

Country

44 Studies found

Order results by:

Sort by:

	Study	Published
	Factors affecting bat house occupancy in Colorado Based on: White E.P. (2004). Study Link	2004
	Limited use of bat boxes in a rural landscape: implications for offsetting the clearing of hollow-bearing trees Based on: Rueegger N., Goldingay R.L., Law B. & Gonsalves L. (2019). Study Link	2019
	The development of new bat boxes made from Styrofoam for use in winter roosts Die Entwicklung neuer Kästen aus Styropor für den Einsatz in Fledermaus-Winterquartieren Based on: Horn J. (2006). Study Link	2006
	Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes may alter local bat community structure Based on: Griffiths S.R., Lumsden L.F., Bender R., Irvine R., Godinho L.N., Visintin C., Eastick D., Robert K.A. & Lentini P.E. (2018). Study Link	2018
	In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style Based on: Hoeh J.P.S., Bakken G.S., Mitchell W.A. & O'Keefe J.M. (2018). Study Link	2018
	Reviewing the evidence on mitigation strategies for bats in buildings: informing best-practice for policy makers and practitioners Based on: Lintott P. & Mathews F. (2018) Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM), UK report. Study Link	2018
	Bat boxes in urban non-native forests: a popular practice that should be reconsidered Based on: López-Baucells A., Puig-Montserrat X., Torre I., Freixas L., Mas M., Arrizabalaga A. & Flaquer C. (2017). Study Link	2017
	Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool Based on: Griffiths S.R., Bender R., Godinho L.N., Lentini P.E., Lumsden L.F. & Robert K.A. (2017). Study Link	2017
	The effectiveness of bat boxes as a continuous ecological functionality measure Zur Wirksamkeit von Fledermauskästen als vorgezogene Ausgleichsmaßnahme Based on: Zahn A. & Hammer M. (2017). Study Link	2017
	Bat boxes - a review of their use and application, past, present and future Based on: Rueegger N. (2016). Study Link	2016
	Occupation of shelter boxes by bats in Salburua Park (Vitoria-Gasteiz) Ocupación de cajas-refugio por murciélagos en el parque de Salburua (Vitoria-Gasteiz) Based on: Alcalde J.T. & Martínez I. (2016). Study Link	2016
	The Vincent Wildlife Trust’s Irish Bat Box Schemes Based on: McAney K. & Hanniffy R. (2015) The Vincent Wildlife Trust, UK report. Study Link	2015
	*Roost site selection in pregnant and lactating soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus* Leach, 1825) at the species northern extreme: the importance of warm and safe roosts** Based on: Michaelsen T.C., Jensen K.H. & Hogstedt G. (2014). Study Link	2014
	Artificial bat roosts did not accelerate forest regeneration in abandoned pastures in southern Costa Rica Based on: Reid J.L., Holste E.K. & Zahawi R.A. (2013). Study Link	2013
	Occupancy of bat-boxes in Navarre Ocupación de cajas-refugio por murciélagos en Navarra Based on: Alcalde J.T., Campion D.G., Fabo J., Marín F., Artázcoz A., Martínez I. & Antón I. (2013). Study Link	2013
	Artificial roosts for tree-roosting bats in northern Arizona Based on: Mering E.D. & Chambers C.L. (2012). Study Link	2012
	Artificial roosts for bats: education and research. The "Be a Bat's Friend" project of the Natural History Museum of the University of Florence Based on: Agnelli P., Maltagliati G., Ducci L. & Cannicci S> (2011). Study Link	2011
	The efficacy of nestboxes versus spotlighting for detecting feathertail gliders Based on: Ward S.J. (2000). Study Link	2000
	*Mitigating the impact of bats in historic churches: the response of Natterer’s bats Myotis nattereri* to artificial roosts and deterrence** Based on: Zeale M.R.K, Bennitt E., Newson S.E, Packman C., Browne W.J, Harris S., Jones G. & Stone E. (2016). Study Link	2016
	Conservation of breeding colonies of cave-dwelling bats using man-made roosts Conservación de colonias reproductoras de murciélagos cavernícolas mediante refugios artificiales Based on: Alcalde J.T, Martínez I, Zaldua A & Antón I (2017). Study Link	2017
	Mitigating the effect of development on bats in England with derogation licensing Based on: Stone E.L, Jones G. & Harris S. (2013). Study Link	2013
	Bats and licensing: a report on the success of maternity roost compensation measures Based on: Mackintosh M. (2016) NatureScot report, no. 928. Study Link	2016
	An investigation of the impact of development projects on bat populations: Comparing pre- and post-development bat faunas Based on: Aughney T (2008) Bat Conservation Ireland report. Study Link	2008
	Performance of artificial maternity bat roost structures near Bath, UK Based on: Garland L., Wells M. & Markham S. (2017). Study Link	2017
	Use of artificial roost structures by bats at the Indianapolis international airport Based on: Whitaker J.J., Sparks D. & Brack V.J. (2006). Study Link	2006

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.