The effect of gates on cave entry by swarming bats
-
Published source details
Pugh M. & Altringham J.D. (2005) The effect of gates on cave entry by swarming bats. Acta Chiropterologica, 7, 293-299.
Published source details Pugh M. & Altringham J.D. (2005) The effect of gates on cave entry by swarming bats. Acta Chiropterologica, 7, 293-299.
Actions
This study is summarised as evidence for the following.
Action | Category | |
---|---|---|
Install and maintain cave gates to restrict public access Action Link |
![]() |
-
Install and maintain cave gates to restrict public access
A randomized, controlled, before-and-after study in 2004 at a cave in a wooded limestone valley in northern England, UK (Pugh & Altringham 2005) found that cave gates with horizontal bar spacings of 130 mm and 100 mm caused more bats to abort attempts to enter the cave through the gate, but gates with spacings of 150 mm had no effect on bat behaviour. The proportion of bats entering the cave decreased after gates were installed with horizontal spacings of 130 mm (without gate: 0.20–0.28 bats/30 min; with gate: 0.07 bats/30 min) and 100 mm (without gate: 0.20 bats/30 min; with gate: 0.08 bats/30 min). Gates with horizontal spacings of 150 mm had no significant effect (without gate: 0.14–0.16 bats/30 min; with gate: 0.10 bats/30 min). Bat behaviour was similar before the gates were installed and after they were removed. One cave entrance was used for the experiments (1.5 m diameter) with custom made gates (made with 15 mm diameter plastic tubing) of each of three horizontal spacings (100, 130 and 150 mm) positioned over it. Bats were recorded for 3 x 30-minute periods with the gate open (‘before’), closed, and open again (‘after’). The behaviour of swarming bats (mostly Natterer’s bats Myotis nattereri) was observed on 6–10 nights for each of three gate designs using night video recording, with gate size randomized between nights.
(Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)
Output references
|