Does burning degrade blanket bog? CEE Review 03-001

  • Published source details Stewart G.B., Coles C.F. & Pullin A.S. (2004) Does burning degrade blanket bog? CEE Review 03-001. CEE (Collaboration for Environmental Evidence) Systematic Reviews, SR1.


Burning, traditionally used in moorland management in some areas of the uplands of UK, has a significant impact on floristic composition and vegetation structure. Blanket bogs, many of high nature conservation value, are one of the habitats that are impacted, but whether of not burning is compatible with nature conservation objectives, such as maintaining plant communities, is often unclear.

A systematic review (see: for methodology) of the effects of burning on blanket bog was undertaken in order to determine if burning is compatible with nature conservation objectives, specifically, whether or not burning degrades blanket bog vegetation. Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis, these reported the results of 11 independent datasets.

Three data sets indicated that burning degraded blanket bog, five were contradictory and three indicated that burning did not degrade blanket bog. The evidence for degradation became stronger when randomized controlled trials were distinguished from site comparisons. However, outcomes were dependent on interpreting changes in floristic composition in the context of favourable condition criteria. They were not robust to changes in favourable condition criteria and were subject to problems of scale, standardisation and repeatability.

The weight of available evidence suggests that burning either degrades blanket bog or is contradictory in effect. If quality of evidence is used to discriminate among studies then the evidence for degradation becomes stronger. However, a degree of caution is required given the small sample size, variable timescales of the studies and problems in the interpretation of favourable condition. Only one article (2 datasets) reported on the effects of rotational burning.

Pending further investigation, the authors suggest that burning of blanket bog and wet heath should normally be avoided if favourable condition is to be achieved or maintained.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust