Study

Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors

  • Published source details Söderström B., Svensson B., Vessby K. & Glimskär A. (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 1839-1863.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Protect in-field trees

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation

Reduce grazing intensity on grassland by reducing stocking density

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Protect in-field trees

    A replicated, site comparison study in 1997 in 20 pastures in the Uppsala region, Sweden (Söderström et al. 2001) found that where more trees and trees of more species had been retained in pastures, butterfly species richness was higher, but richness was lower when a high proportion of those trees were large. There was higher butterfly species richness in pastures with more trees and with more species of tree. However, there was lower species richness when a greater proportion of the trees were large (>30 cm diameter at breast height). All data presented as model results. Butterflies were surveyed along the borders of a 100 m2 square walking transect in 20 grazed semi-natural pastures, repeated 18 times/pasture in July 1997. Tree cover was assessed using maps, aerial photos and field surveys, and tree species and diameter were assessed in the field.

    (Summarised by: Eleanor Bladon)

  2. Reduce grazing intensity on grassland by reducing stocking density

    A replicated, site comparison study in 1997 in 20 pastures in the Uppsala region, Sweden (Söderström et al 2001) found that on pastures with lower grazing intensity, butterfly species richness was higher. In pastures with lower grazing intensity butterfly richness was higher (data presented as model results). Pastures were mostly cattle-grazed annually from May–October. Grazing intensity was measured as the proportion of grass shorter than 5 cm throughout the period. Grass height was estimated three times in May–June 1997 in 1-ha quadrats covering the whole of each of 20 grazed semi-natural pastures. In July 1997, butterflies were surveyed along the borders of a 100 m2 square walking transect in pastures, repeated 18 times/pasture.

    (Summarised by: Eleanor Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust