Study

Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota

  • Published source details Connell S.D. (2000) Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 247, 183-194.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use environmentally-sensitive material on subtidal artificial structures

Action Link
Biodiversity of Marine Artificial Structures
  1. Use environmentally-sensitive material on subtidal artificial structures

    A replicated, randomized, paired sites, controlled study in 1998–1999 on four subtidal pontoons and four rocky reefs in Sydney Harbour estuary, Australia (Connell 2000) found that sandstone and concrete settlement plates supported similar macroalgae and invertebrate community composition, while abundances varied depending on the species group. After seven months, macroalgae and non-mobile invertebrate community composition was similar on sandstone and concrete settlement plates (data reported as statistical model results). Sandstone plates supported higher abundance of red macroalgae (2–33% cover) and green macroalgae (2–13%) than concrete plates (red: 1–15%; green: 1–7%), but fewer Spirorbid tubeworms (0–37 vs 0–48%). Abundances were similar on sandstone and concrete plates for brown macroalgae (1–10 vs 1–17%), mussels (Mytilus edulis: 1–34 vs 3–44%), barnacles (Cirripedia: 1–37 vs 1–41%), sponges (Porifera: both 1–9%), bryozoans (Bryozoa: 0–38 vs 0–49%), ascidians (Ascidiacea: 0–25 vs 0–16%) and Serpulid tubeworms (3–17 vs 3–16%). Settlement plates (150 × 150 mm) were made from sandstone and concrete. Five of each were randomly arranged vertically at 0.3 m depth on each of four concrete pontoons and at 1.5 m depth on each of four adjacent sandstone reefs in June 1998. Macroalgae and non-mobile invertebrates on plates were counted in the laboratory after seven months.

    (Summarised by: Ally Evans)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust