Study

Post-fire control of invasive plants promotes native recovery in a burned desert shrubland

  • Published source details Steers R.J. & Allen E.B. (2010) Post-fire control of invasive plants promotes native recovery in a burned desert shrubland. Restoration Ecology, 18, 334-343.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Apply herbicide and remove plants to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation

Rake to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation

Use herbicide to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation
  1. Apply herbicide and remove plants to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study in 2005–2008 in creosote bush shrubland invaded by non-native grasses in California, USA (Steers & Allen 2010) found that spraying with herbicide, followed by weeding, decreased invasive grass cover, increased the cover of native grass and forb species, but did not increase the number of annual plant species. Areas that were sprayed with herbicide and were weeded had lower non-native grass cover (0–38%) than areas that were not sprayed or weeded (40–65%). Also, areas that were sprayed with herbicide and weeded had lower had higher cover of native grass and forb species (20–87%) than areas that were not sprayed or weeded (13–36%). However, the number of native annual plants was not significantly different in areas that had been sprayed with herbicide and weeded (4–18%) and unsprayed and unweeded areas (23–37%). In January 2006 and 2008 twelve 8 m x 8 m plots were sprayed with the grass specific herbicide Fusilade-II and then weeded by hand while twelve other plots were not sprayed with herbicide or weeded. Plant cover was recorded in March-April 2006 and 2008 in 0.5 m2 quadrats located in each plot.

    (Summarised by: Phil Martin)

  2. Rake to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled, paired study in 2005–2008 in creosote bush shrubland that was invaded by non-native grasses in California, USA (Steers & Allen 2010) found that raking reduced invasive grass cover but did not increase the number of annual plant species, and also reduced the cover of native grasses and forb species in two of four cases. In four of four cases areas that were raked had lower non-native grass cover (36–39%) than areas that were not raked (60–65%). In four of four cases the number of annual plant species in areas that had been raked (2–4 species/plot) did not differ significantly from the areas that had not been raked (3–4 species/plot). However, in two of four cases cover of native grass and forb species was lower in areas that had been raked (4–18%) than in areas that had not been raked (23–37%). In January 2006 and 2008 twelve 8 m x 8 m plots were raked to remove invasive grasses while twelve other plots were not raked. Plant cover was recorded in March-April 2006 and 2008 in 0.5 m2 quadrats located in each plot.

    (Summarised by: Phil Martin)

  3. Use herbicide to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled, paired site study in 2005–2008 in creosote bush shrubland that was invaded by non-native grasses in California, USA (Steers & Allen 2010) found that spraying with herbicide reduced the cover of non-native grasses in four of four cases, increased the number of annual plant species in two of four cases and increased cover of native grass and forb species in three of four cases. In four of four cases, areas sprayed with herbicide had lower non-native grass cover (0–27%) than areas where no herbicide was sprayed (40–65%). In two of four cases, areas where herbicide had been sprayed had more annual plant species (7 species/plot) than areas that had not been sprayed (4–5 species/plot). In three of four cases where herbicide was sprayed cover of native grass and forb species was higher (58–89% cover) than areas where no herbicide was sprayed (22–37% cover). In January 2006 and 2008 twelve 8 x 8 m plots were sprayed with the grass specific herbicide Fusilade-II while in twelve other plots herbicide was not sprayed. Plant cover was recorded in March-April 2006 and 2008 in 0.5 m2 quadrats located in each plot.

    (Summarised by: Phil Martin)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust