Study

Effect of streambank fencing on herpetofauna in pasture stream zones

  • Published source details Homyack J.D. & Giuliano W.M (2002) Effect of streambank fencing on herpetofauna in pasture stream zones. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 361–369.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Exclude domestic animals or wild hogs by fencing

Action Link
Amphibian Conservation

Cease livestock grazing: Grassland & shrubland

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Exclude domestic animals or wild hogs by fencing

    A replicated, site comparison study in 1998–1999 of streams in pasture in Pennsylvania, USA (Homyack & Giuliano 2002) found that excluding livestock from stream banks did not increase amphibian species richness or abundance overall, but did increase tadpole numbers. There was no significant difference in overall species richness, abundance or biomass, or in the abundance of salamanders, bullfrogs Rana catesbeiana or wood frog Rana sylvatica between fenced and unfenced streams. However, tadpole captures were higher in fenced compared to unfenced areas (20 vs 6). In comparison, captures were higher in unfenced compared to fenced areas for green frogs Rana clamitans (8 vs 5/site) and American toads Bufo americanus (2.4 vs 1.5). Ten grazed and 10 recently fenced (1–2 yrs) streams were selected over 20 farms. Sites were 100m long by 10–15 m wide on both banks. Monitoring was undertaken using two drift-fences per site. Each fence had a pitfall trap, side-flap pail-trap and funnel trap that were checked 3–4 times/week in April–July.

  2. Cease livestock grazing: Grassland & shrubland

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 1998–1999 in streams through pasture and associated riparian areas on farms in Pennsylvania, USA (Homyack & Giuliano 2002) found that excluding livestock grazing did not increase combined reptile and amphibian species richness or abundance within 1–3 years. Overall reptile and amphibian species richness and abundance, and overall snake and turtle abundances were similar between sites fenced to exclude livestock and unfenced grazed sites (results reported as statistical tests). Of three snake species detected, abundances were higher in fenced compared to unfenced sites for northern queen Regina septemvittata (fenced: 6 individuals/site; unfenced: 2) and eastern garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis (fenced: 5; unfenced: 2) and similar for northern water snake Nerodia sipedon (fenced: 5;  unfenced: 4). Ten fenced and ungrazed and 10 unfenced and grazed streams and riparian areas (100 m long, 10–15 m wide) were compared on private farms. All ungrazed sites had been grazed until they were fenced to exclude livestock 1–2 years prior to 1998 (4-strand electric fence). Unfenced stream sites and surrounding pastures were grazed continuously with an average stocking rate of 0.4 animals/ha. Reptiles were monitored using drift fences with pitfall traps set perpendicular to streams, coverboards and opportunistically using hand captures. Traps were checked 3–4 times a week from April–July 1998 and 1999.

    (Summarised by: Maggie Watson, Katie Sainsbury)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust