Study

Effectiveness of the removal of coral-eating predator Acanthaster planci in Pulau Tioman Marine Park, Malaysia

  • Published source details Chak S.T.C., Dumont C.P., Adzis K-AAbd & Yewdall K. (2018) Effectiveness of the removal of coral-eating predator Acanthaster planci in Pulau Tioman Marine Park, Malaysia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98, 183-189.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Control spread of non-native/invasive/problematic invertebrates using biological, chemical and/or mechanical methods

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Control spread of non-native/invasive/problematic invertebrates using biological, chemical and/or mechanical methods

    A replicated, controlled study in 2009–2010 at three coral reef sites in Malaysia (Chak et al. 2018) found that seasonal removal of invasive crown of thorns starfish Acanthaster planci led to higher live stony coral cover, but increased mortality for one stony coral species and had no effect on community composition, compared to sites where no starfish were removed. For six months after the removal season, live coral cover increased in sites where starfish were removed (0 months: 31–78%; 6 months: 44–78%) but decreased in sites with no starfish removal (0 months: 40–69%; 6 months: 7–52%). Starfish removal had no effect on mortality for Acropora (removal: 27–71%; no removal: 29–64%), Montipora (removal: 2–17%; no removal: 0–25%), and Pavona (removal: 2.3–100%; no removal: 0–100%), but increased Porites mortality (0–38%; 50–95%). Starfish removal had no effect on the coral community (data reported as graphical analysis). From March–September each year since 1998, invasive crown of thorns starfish were removed manually by volunteers and through clean ups organized by dive shops. Three sites were surveyed after the 2009 removal season: twice in August 2009 and twice in April 2010. They were compared with three control sites, where no removal had taken place for 10 years. At each reef site, 20 photo-quadrats (50 cm2) were taken in each of eight belt transects (50 x 2 m) at 2–10 m depth during daytime. Coral composition and percent cover were estimated from 25 random points/5 x 5 grid cell/photo-quadrat. Mortality was measured as the relative percent of dead corals.

    (Summarised by: Vanessa Cutts)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust