Study

A caution for conservation stocking as an approach for recovering Atlantic eels

  • Published source details Stacey J.A., Pratt T.C., Verreault G. & Fox M.G. (2015) A caution for conservation stocking as an approach for recovering Atlantic eels. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 25, 569-580.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

    A study in 20092011 in a river system in Ontario, Canada (Stacey et al. 2015) found that translocated wild American eels Anguilla rostrata had faster growing females, a higher percentage of males, and matured and migrated at smaller sizes compared to naturally occurring eels. On average, female translocated eels grew faster at ages 23 years (90120 mm/year) than naturally occurring eels (5356 mm/year). Growth rates did not differ significantly at ages one (101 vs 87 mm/year) and four years (53 vs 47 mm/year). A greater percentage of males were captured for translocated eels (4052%) than naturally occurring eels (0%). Migrating translocated eels were reported to be shorter in length (average 651 mm) than naturally occurring eels (average 940 mm), although the difference was not tested for statistical significance. In 20052010, approximately 6.8 million glass eels captured in rivers by commercial fishers in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were translocated to three sites in the river system. Eels were quarantined and marked before release. In May and September 20092011, translocated eels were captured during electrofishing surveys at two of the release areas. Naturally occurring eels were collected from an eel ladder at a power station. Captured eels (68 translocated, 96 naturally occurring) were weighed and measured, and a sample euthanized to determine age and sex. Migrating eels (191 translocated, 1,277 naturally occurring) were captured in the estuary of the river system by commercial fishers.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust