Study

Yield per recruit from stocking two different sizes of eel (Anguilla anguilla) in the brackish Roskilde Fjord

  • Published source details Pedersen M.I. & Rasmussen G.H. (2016) Yield per recruit from stocking two different sizes of eel (Anguilla anguilla) in the brackish Roskilde Fjord. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73, 158-164.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Release wild-caught captive-reared eels to re-establish or boost native populations ('head-starting')

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Release wild-caught captive-reared eels to re-establish or boost native populations ('head-starting')

    A study in 20012011 at a fjord in Denmark (Pedersen & Rasmussen 2016) found that wild-caught captive-reared European eels Anguilla anguilla released at two different sizes had similar mortality rates, and small eels grew faster than large eels. During 38 years after release, average annual mortality rates did not differ significantly between captive-reared and released large (64%) and small eels (52%). Released small eels had greater average annual growth rates (52 mm) than large eels (44 mm). During 213 years after release, recapture rates of captive-reared and released eels were estimated to be 13% for small eels and 9% for large eels (difference not statistically tested). In JulySeptember 1998 and JuneJuly 1999, European eels of two sizes (large: 89 g, total 50,000 eels; small: 3 g, total 274,000 eels) were tagged and released into a brackish fjord (water depths of 13 m over vegetation or soft bottom). All eels had been imported as glass eels from France and reared in an aquaculture facility for 36 months before release. In 20012006, a proportion of commercial fisheries catches (15%) were checked for tagged eels. Recaptured eels were weighed and measured in length. Recapture rates for 20072011 were estimated using growth and mortality rates.  

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust