Study

Preliminary evaluation of a large‐scale American eel conservation stocking experiment

  • Published source details Pratt T.C. & Threader R.W. (2011) Preliminary evaluation of a large‐scale American eel conservation stocking experiment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 31, 619-628.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

    A study in 2009 in a lake and adjoining river in Ontario, Canada (Pratt & Threader 2011) reported that translocated wild American eels Anguilla rostrata dispersed and increased in length and weight. Results are not based on tests of statistical significance. Translocated eels were recaptured or observed at six locations within the lake (40300 km from release sites, total 253 eels) and at one location in the river (30 km downstream of release sites, total 88 eels). The average length and weight of translocated eels increased between spring and autumn in both the lake (spring: 131 mm, 3 g; autumn: 147 mm, 6 g) and river (spring: 172 mm, 12 g; autumn: 291 mm, 53 g). Wild American eels were translocated to five sites in a lake (1.3 million glass eels in 20082009) and five sites in an adjoining river (167,000 elvers in 2006, 2.6 million glass eels in 20072009). Eels were obtained from a commercial fishery, and were quarantined and marked before release. In spring and autumn 2009, boat electrofishing was carried out at night along transects (100-m long, 2.5-m wide) in the lake (2833 transects) and river (4244 transects). Captured eels (lake: 144 eels, river: 28 eels) were measured and weighed. Size was estimated for eels observed from the boat (lake: 109 eels, river: 60 eels).

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust