Study

Influence of artificial fertilization methods of the hormone-treated Japanese eel Anguilla japonica upon the quality of eggs and larvae (comparison between stripping-insemination and spontaneous spawning methods)

  • Published source details Horie N., Utoh T., Mikawa N., Yamada Y., Okamura A., Tanaka S. & Tsukamoto K. (2008) Influence of artificial fertilization methods of the hormone-treated Japanese eel Anguilla japonica upon the quality of eggs and larvae (comparison between stripping-insemination and spontaneous spawning methods). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi (Japanese edition), 74, 26-35.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Breed eels in captivity

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Breed eels in captivity

    A replicated study in 2006 at a research facility in Japan (Horie et al. 2008) found that Japanese eel Anguilla japonica eggs and larvae produced from spontaneous spawning and fertilization had higher fertilization, hatching and survival rates, and lower deformity rates, compared to eggs and larvae produced from manual egg extraction and fertilization. On average, eggs and larvae produced from spontaneous spawning and fertilization had higher fertilization (80%), hatching (62%) and survival rates (54%), and lower deformity rates (60%), than those produced from manual egg extraction and fertilization (fertilization = 41%, hatching = 31%, survival = 27%, deformity = 79%). In March–June 2006, eel eggs were produced from spontaneous spawning and fertilization in one experimental group (each of 12 ovulating females placed in a tank with three males releasing sperm), and from manual egg extraction and fertilization in another (eggs manually extracted from each of 15 ovulated females and inseminated with stored sperm). Female eels were wild-caught and captive-reared. Male eels were sourced from farms. Hormones were used to induce maturation, ovulation and sperm production. Samples of fertilized eggs from both groups were reared in microplates (three samples/female/treatment). Fertilization rates were estimated after 4 h, hatching rates after 28 h, and larvae survival and deformity rates after five days. 

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - NT Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust