Study

Efficacy of a side-mounted vertically oriented bristle pass for improving upstream passage of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) at an experimental Crump weir

  • Published source details Kerr J.R., Karageorgopoulos P. & Kemp P.S. (2015) Efficacy of a side-mounted vertically oriented bristle pass for improving upstream passage of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) at an experimental Crump weir. Ecological Engineering, 85, 121-131.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Install climbing structures for fish

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Install climbing structures for fish

    A replicated, controlled study in 2011 in an indoor channel in the UK (Kerr et al. 2015) found that installing vertical bristle fish passes resulted in greater numbers of yellow European eels Anguilla anguilla passing upstream over an experimental weir at high, but not medium or low, water velocities. At high water velocities, the percentage of times eels successfully passed the weir was greater with fish passes installed for small (92%) and large eels (57%) than without fish passes (small eels: 0%, large eels: 5%). The percentage of large eels that successfully passed the weir was also higher with fish passes installed (77%) than without (17%). Successful passage of small and large eels did not differ significantly with and without fish passes installed at medium and low water velocities (see paper for data). A Crump weir (34 cm high) was installed in an indoor channel (21 m long, 1.4 m wide, 0.6 m deep). Vertical fish passes (10-mm thick polypropylene boards), each covered with clusters of 24 synthetic bristles (70 mm long, 1.5 mm diameter, spaced 30 mm apart), were installed along both sides of the weir, facing towards the channel wall. In May–July 2011, wild-caught small (82–320 mm long) and large (322–660 mm long) yellow eels were released in the channel during 2–4 trials (8–12 eels/trial) at each of three water velocities (maximum velocity: 'high' = 2.4 m/s, 'medium' = 1.9 m/s, 'low' = 0.8 m/s), with and without fish passes installed. Each trial was carried out at night and lasted 5.5 h. Eel behaviour was monitored with video cameras. Large eels were radio-tagged. 

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust