Study

Growth patterns and age validation from otolith ring deposition in New Zealand longfin eels Anguilla dieffenbachii recaptured after 10 years at large

  • Published source details Beentjes M.P. & Jellyman D.J. (2015) Growth patterns and age validation from otolith ring deposition in New Zealand longfin eels Anguilla dieffenbachii recaptured after 10 years at large. Journal of Fish Biology, 86, 924-939.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

Action Link
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
  1. Translocate wild eels to re-establish or boost native populations (‘stocking’ or ‘restocking’)

    A before-and-after study in 1998 and 2008 in a lake in Otago region, New Zealand (Beentjes & Jellyman 2015) found that translocated wild longfin eels Anguilla dieffenbachii were recaptured in low numbers, and they grew faster and were in better condition than before translocation. Of 2,010 translocated, tagged eels, 79 (4%) were recaptured 10 years later. During 10 years after release, translocated eels grew at faster rates (average 3.7 cm/year) and were in significantly better condition (data reported as condition factor) than before translocation (average 2.4 cm/year). Growth rates increased after translocation and remained high for 4–5 years before declining (see paper for details). On average, eels were larger after 10 years (total length: 77 cm, body mass: 1,462 g) than before translocation (42 cm, 173 g), although the difference was not statistically tested. In February 1998, approximately 9,500 juvenile longfin eels were caught by commercial fishers in the tidal reaches of a river. Captured eels were transported 200 km upstream to a lake, of which 2,010 were tagged, weighed and measured before release. During one night in 2008, 399 eels were recaptured in fyke nets by a commercial eel fisher, 79 of which (all females) had tags. Condition, length and body mass were measured for all 79 recaptured tagged eels. Otoliths were examined for 76 recaptured tagged eels to determine changes in growth rate.

    (Summarised by: Vanessa Cutts)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust