Study

A management experiment evaluating nest‐site selection by beach‐nesting

  • Published source details Swaisgood R.R., Nordstrom L.A., Schuetz J.G., Boylan J.T., Fournier J.J. & Shemai B. (2018) A management experiment evaluating nest‐site selection by beach‐nesting. Journal of Wildlife Management, 82, 192-201.

Summary

Remove vegetation to create nesting areas

A replicated, controlled study in 2012–2014 on a beach in California, USA (Swaisgood et al. 2018) found that clearing different amounts of vegetation had similar effects on nest density, presence and success for both California least tern Sternula antillarum browni and western snowy plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus. At the plot scale, vegetation cover had no significant effect on nest density or nest success for either species (reported as statistical model results). Nest density was the percentage of all nests present at the study site that occurred in a given plot. Nest success was defined by hatching of ≥1 chick/year. However, plot-scale vegetation cover did affect the predation rate on plover nests, although the effect differed between years (reported as statistical model results). At a smaller scale, there was no significant difference between cleared and uncleared patches (100 patches/plot) in terms of nest presence or nest success. This was true for both terns (cleared: 35% of patches had nests, 79% of nests successful; uncleared: 37% had nests, 76% successful) and plovers (cleared: 4.6% had nests, 56% successful; uncleared: 4.3% had nests, 60% successful). The study used twelve 65 x 90 m plots on one beach. Each plot was split into one hundred 6.5 x 9 m patches. Before nest initiation each year, vegetation was cleared from individual patches in all plots, to generate plot-scale vegetation cover of 5–15% (note the limited range here). Plots were surveyed three times/week through the nesting season.

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust