Study

Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds (genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus: family Procellariidae)

  • Published source details Miskelly C.M., Taylor G.A., Gummer H. & Williams R. (2009) Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds (genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus: family Procellariidae). Biological Conservation, 142, 1965-1980.

Summary

Provide artificial nesting sites for burrow-nesting seabirds

A review of petrel translocation projects in 1997–2008 around New Zealand (Miskelly et al. 2009) reported that 86% of chicks translocated into artificial burrows fledged. In total, 1,791 chicks of eight petrel species were translocated by the authors. Of these, 1,546 fledged. Species fledging rates ranged from 62% (common diving petrel Pelecanoides urinatrix) to 100% (Chatham Island taiko Pterodroma magentae and fairy prion Pachyptila turtur). For all eight species, translocated chicks fed on pureed tinned herring Clupea harengus were at least as heavy as parent-fed chicks upon fledging (see original paper for details). Translocations involved moving good-condition chicks from their natal burrows to artificial burrows ≤240 km away, usually within the same day. Burrow designs slightly differed between islands, but all were dug into the ground or (partially) buried and had an 11-cm-diameter plastic entrance pipe. All chicks were hand-fed until fledging: usually on fish diets but sometimes with pet food. The review included the translocations in (Miskelly & Taylor 2004) and (Gummer et al. 2015).

Translocate birds to (re-)establish populations or increase genetic variation

A review of petrel translocation projects in 1997–2008 around New Zealand (Miskelly et al. 2009) reported that 86% of all translocated chicks fledged, and that five of eight species began breeding at their translocation site. Of 1,791 chicks (eight species) translocated by the authors, 1,546 fledged. Species fledging rates ranged from 62% (common diving petrel Pelecanoides urinatrix) to 100% (Chatham Island taiko Pterodroma magentae and fairy prion Pachyptila turtur). At least 68 individuals (six species) returned to their translocation site as adults. Five species began breeding. For all eight species, translocated chicks (hand-fed pureed tinned herring Clupea harengus) were at least as heavy as parent-fed chicks upon fledging (see original paper for details). Good-condition chicks were taken from their burrows and moved to artificial burrows ≤240 km away, usually within the same day. Chicks were hand-fed until fledging, usually on fish diets but sometimes with pet food. In some translocation sites, speakers played calls of the translocated species. The review included the translocations in (Miskelly & Taylor 2004) and (Gummer et al. 2015).

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust