Study

Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains

  • Published source details Jones H.P., Holmes N.D., Butchart S.H.M., Tershy B.R., Kappes P.J., Corkery I., Aguirre-Muñoz A., Armstrong D.P., Bonnaud E., Burbidge A.A., Campbell K., Courchamp F., Cowan P.E., Cuthbert R.J., Ebbert S., Genovesi P., Howald G.R., Keitt B.S., Kress S.W., Miskelly C.M., Oppel S., Poncet S., Rauzon M.J., Rocamora G., Russell J.C., Samaniego-Herrera A., Seddon P.J., Spatz D.R., Towns D.R. & Croll D.A. (2016) Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113, 4033-4038.

Summary

Control mammalian predators on islands for seabirds

A global review in 2016 (Jones et al. 2016) found that following successful eradications of invasive mammals from islands, most targeted bird species benefitted, with population recovery and recolonizations of islands, while a small number of species suffered negative effects, mostly temporary. Post–eradication, 67 bird species (88 populations of seabirds and 33 populations of land birds) recolonised islands where they had previously been extirpated. Birds that benefitted from eradication included 47% of the world’s critically endangered and 74% of the endangered species seabirds. For three bird species, Seychelles magpie robin Copsychus sechellarum, Cook’s petrel Pterodroma cookii and black-vented shearwater Puffinus opisthomelas, the mammal eradication resulted in qualification for a lower category of extinction risk. Eight bird populations (rufous-crowned sparrow Aimophila ruficeps obscura, Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus, brown skua Stercorarius antarcticus, northern giant petrel Macronectes halli, southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus, Galápagos hawk Buteo galapagoensis, Atlantic puffin Fratercula arctica) suffered negative population–scale impacts of poisoning from which they did not recover 3–17 years post–eradication but four of those were expected to recover in the future. Birds were the main intended beneficiary of mammal eradications, which mainly included rodents (57%), goats (Capra hircus) (11%), and feral cats (Felis catus) (8%).

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - NT Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust