Study

Large-scale coral reef restoration could assist natural recovery in Seychelles, Indian Ocean

  • Published source details Montoya-Maya P.H., Smit K.P., Burt A.J. & Frias-Torres S. (2016) Large-scale coral reef restoration could assist natural recovery in Seychelles, Indian Ocean. Nature Conservation, 16, 1-17.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Transplant nursery-grown coral onto natural substrate

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Transplant nursery-grown coral onto natural substrate

    A before-and-after, site comparison study in 2012–2014 at a coral reef off Cousin Island, Seychelles (Montoya-Maya et al. 2016) found that transplanting fragments of nursery-grown stony coral Acropora and Pocillopora onto natural substrate led to a higher density of settled larvae (coral spat) than at healthy or degraded sites without transplants, and a higher number of juvenile corals than the degraded site. Twenty months after transplantation, density of all coral spat was higher at the transplantation site (124 spat/m2) than at nearby healthy (68 spat/m2) and degraded (78 spat/m2) sites without transplants. However, 24 months after transplanting, the transplantation site had lower density of all juveniles (3 juveniles/m2) than the healthy site (5 juveniles/m2) but higher than the degraded site (2 juveniles/m2). In November 2012–June 2014, a total of 24,431 nursery-grown coral colonies of seven Acropora and four Pocillopora species were transplanted at a 0.52 ha area of degraded reef (<3% coverage of corals in 2012, 16% in 2014). Transplantation methods not provided. A 0.12 ha healthy site (14% coverage in 2012, 35% in 2014) and a 0.13 ha degraded site (<3% coverage in both years), both without transplantations, were chosen for comparison. Sites were adjacent, 50 m apart from their neighbouring site. In January 2014, forty ceramic tiles were placed 8–10 m deep at each site, retrieved in July 2014 and inspected for coral spat of any species and returned to the sites. Juvenile corals were surveyed along six 10-m transects and in three randomly placed 1-m2 quadrats at each site before transplantation started, and at 12, 18 and 24 months after.

    (Summarised by: Eleanor Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust