Study

Initial survival of coral nubbins transplanted by a new coral transplantation technology-options for reef rehabilitation

  • Published source details Treeck P.V. & Schuhmacher H. (1997) Initial survival of coral nubbins transplanted by a new coral transplantation technology-options for reef rehabilitation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 150, 287-292.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use electrical current to stimulate coral growth

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Use electrical current to stimulate coral growth

    A replicated study (year not given) in the Gulf of Aqaba, Jordan (van Treeck & Schuhmacher 1997), reported that using and electrical current to stimulate mineral formation resulted in all transplanted stony coral nubbins (small fragments) attaching to the substrate, but survival rates were species, but not depth-dependent. Eight weeks after transplanting, all coral nubbins were fully attached to the steel mesh cathodes. After three months, survival rate for all nubbins was over 80%, except Pocillopora damicornis at 6 m deep (16%) and Acropora squarrosa (reported on graph as Pocillopora damicornis) at 12 m (72%). Survival after seven months ranged from 0% (Polillopora damicornis at 6 m) to 96% (Acropora variabilis at 6 m and 18 m deep), and after 12 months (12 m depth only) survival ranged from 36% (Acropora squarrosa) to 72% (Acropora variabilis). Results were not statistically tested. A total of 400 nubbins from six stony coral species (Acropora variabilis, Acropora squarrosa, Stylophora pistillata, Pocillopora damicornis, Montipora danae, and Pavona varians) were collected from colonies near the experimental site. Four cathodes comprising 1 × 3 m non-galvanized 10 mm steel mesh squares were fixed horizontally to the natural coral rock at each of 1, 6, 12 and 18 m deep using steel wire. The anode (titanium mesh square) was suspended 20 cm above the cathode. Nubbins were attached to each square (25 from each of four of the six species/square; see paper for configuration). The cathode and anode were attached to a power supply and an electrical current was put through the squares for 18h/day for two months, then switched off. Attachment was recorded after two and eight weeks. Survival was recorded after three and seven months, and after 12 months just for 12 m depth.

    (Summarised by: Ann Thornton)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust