Study

A comparison of epibenthic reef communities settling on commonly used experimental substrates: PVC versus ceramic tiles

  • Published source details Mallela J., Milne B.C. & Martinez-Escobar D. (2017) A comparison of epibenthic reef communities settling on commonly used experimental substrates: PVC versus ceramic tiles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 486, 290-295.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use settlement tiles made from unnatural materials to encourage natural coral settlement

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Use settlement tiles made from unnatural materials to encourage natural coral settlement

    A replicated study in 2012–2015 at coral reef patches (‘microatolls’) off One Tree Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Mallela et al. 2017) found that PVC pipes and the top of ceramic settlement tiles were colonized by a lower number of small stony coral recruits than the underside of ceramic tiles but there was no difference for larger coral colonies or overall coral cover. After 34 months, no coral recruits (<1 cm) were attached to PVC pipes or the top of ceramic tiles, compared to an average of 0.2 (range 0–2) on the underside of ceramic tiles. There was no difference in the average number of coral colonies (>1 cm) attached to PVC pipes (0.7, range 0–8) or the underside (0.6, range 0–7) or topside (0.2, range 0–3) of ceramic tiles. There was no difference in total coral cover (recruits and colonies) between settlement materials (data presented as a figure). In May 2012, thirty PVC pipes and 61 unglazed ceramic tiles were each fixed, horizontally, to a PVC frame attached to the substrate using cable ties. Ceramic tiles were placed in pairs with one tile facing upwards (30 tiles) and one facing down (31 tiles). PVC frames were placed randomly within three microtolls at 1–2 m deep. Corals were counted and measured in March 2015.

    (Summarised by: Ann Thornton)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust