Study

The impacts of competitive interactions on coral colonies after transplantation: A multispecies experiment from the Florida Keys, US

  • Published source details Lustic C., Maxwell K., Bartels E., Reckenbeil B., Utset E., Schopmeyer S., Zink I. & Lirman D. (2020) The impacts of competitive interactions on coral colonies after transplantation: A multispecies experiment from the Florida Keys, US. Bulletin of Marine Science, 96, 805-818.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Remove problematic species

Action Link
Coral Conservation

Transplant nursery-grown coral onto natural substrate

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Remove problematic species

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2016–2017 at a coral reef in Florida, USA (Lustic et al. 2020) found that removing algae, along with zoanthids Palythoa caribaeorum, from around colonies of three stony coral species immediately after transplanting resulted in greater overall survival compared to those with algae and zoanthids removed monthly or not removed, and there were mixed effects on growth. After 17–18 months, overall survival for three coral species combined was greater at transplant sites where algae and zoanthids were initially removed than at sites where algae and zoanthids were removed monthly or not removed (data reported as statistical model results). Removing algae and zoanthids initially or monthly led to greater increases in volume of staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis colonies (990–1,409%), greater losses in surface area of great star coral Montastraea cavernosa colonies (-25 to -30%) and similar losses in surface area of mountainous star coral Orbicella faveolate colonies (-4 to -12%) compared to colonies without algae and zoanthids removed (staghorn: 570%; great star: -8%; mountainous star: -12%). In March 2016, forty-five nursery-grown colonies of each of three coral species (staghorn: 66–575 cm3; great star: 45–120 cm2; mountainous star: 38–130 cm2) were transplanted onto hard substrate on a reef. One of each of three treatments was applied to each colony: algae and zoanthids Palythoa caribaeorum removed from a circle of 25-cm radius at the time of transplanting or at monthly intervals, or algae not removed (15 colonies/species/treatment). Colony survival and growth (volume or surface area of live tissue) were recorded after 3, 6, 9, 13 and 17–18 months.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

  2. Transplant nursery-grown coral onto natural substrate

    A replicated, randomized study in 2016–2017 at a coral reef in Florida, USA (Lustic et al. 2020) found that the majority of nursery-grown colonies of three stony coral species transplanted onto natural substrate survived, and surviving colonies of one of three coral species increased in size, while the other two decreased. After 17–18 months, 46 of 60 (77%) staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis colonies, 43 of 60 (72%) great star coral Montastraea cavernosa colonies, and 55 of 60 (92%) mountainous star coral Orbicella faveolata colonies survived. On average, surviving staghorn coral colonies increased in volume by 1,015%, whereas great star coral and mountainous star coral colonies decreased in surface area by 23% and 11%, respectively. Staghorn coral colonies (66–575 cm3) were collected from an ex-situ nursery, and great star (45–120 cm2) and mountainous star (38–130 cm2) coral colonies from an in-situ nursery. In March 2016, sixty colonies of each species were transplanted onto the hard substrate of a coral reef (≥2-m apart, 8-m deep) using nails and zipties or cement and Plaster of Paris. Areas around half of the transplant sites were cleared of algae and zoanthids Palythoa caribaeorum. After 17-18 months, surviving colonies were counted and measured in the field or from photographs.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust