Study

Effectiveness of a deep-sea cold-water coral marine protected area, following eight years of fisheries closure

  • Published source details Huvenne V.A.I., Bett B.J., Masson D.G., Bas T.P.L. & Wheeler A.J. (2016) Effectiveness of a deep-sea cold-water coral marine protected area, following eight years of fisheries closure. Biological Conservation, 200, 60-69.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Designate a Marine Protected Area and prohibit some fishing and collection (including where restrictions are unspecified)

Action Link
Coral Conservation
  1. Designate a Marine Protected Area and prohibit some fishing and collection (including where restrictions are unspecified)

    A before-and-after study in 1998–2011 at two sites containing deep sea cold-water coral mounds west of Scotland, UK (Huvenne et al. 2016) found that after designating a Marine Protected Area that prohibited some fishing and collecting there was no change in coral Lophelia pertusa and Madrepora oculate cover at one site and a disappearance of most corals at the other site. At one site coral cover was similar eight years after protection was established (47%) compared to 3–5 years before protection (55%). At the other site, cover was 0% eight years after protection compared to 45% in the 3–5 years before protection. Video data after protection found a few cases of coral regrowth but no evidence of coral recolonisation from larval settlement. In addition, there was a significant reduction of trawling after protection compared to before, particularly at the site where all corals were lost (data presented graphically). In 2003, an area containing deep sea cold-water coral mounds was closed to bottom trawling and designated as a permanent protected area in 2004. Video and sonar surveys were conducted in 1998–2000 (3–5 years prior to protection), and follow up surveys were carried out in 2011, eight years after initial fishery closures. The proportion of survey trips that travelled over live coral and presence of trawling scars were recorded. 

    (Summarised by: William Morgan)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust