Study

Foraging ecology and reproductive biology of the stonechat Saxicola torquata: Comparison between a revitalized, intensively cultivated and a historical, traditionally cultivated agro-ecosystem

  • Published source details Revaz E., Schaub M. & Arlettaz R. (2008) Foraging ecology and reproductive biology of the stonechat Saxicola torquata: Comparison between a revitalized, intensively cultivated and a historical, traditionally cultivated agro-ecosystem. Journal of Ornithology, 149, 301-312.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Provide or retain set‐aside areas in farmland

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Provide or retain set‐aside areas in farmland

    A site comparison study in 1999–2000 in two agricultural regions in Geneva and Valais, Switzerland (Revaz et al. 2008) found that sites within an intensively cultivated region with set-aside areas had a similar abundance and biomass of butterflies and moths to a traditional, extensively cultivated region. The abundance and biomass of adult butterflies and moths (abundance: 5.2 individuals/site; biomass: 6.9 mg/site) and caterpillars (abundance: 2.4–2.8 individuals/site; biomass: 23.1–28.3 mg/site) in set-aside strips in an intensively farmed landscape was not significantly different from sites in an extensively farmed landscape (adults: 1.5 individuals/site, 3.9 mg/site; caterpillars: 1.5–2.3 individuals/site, 3.9–57.6 mg/site). From 1991–1998, a total of 83 set-aside strips (10-m wide, totalling 19 ha) were established across one 500-ha agricultural region. A second, 360-ha region was extensively cultivated. Between March and September 1999 and 2000, grass-dwelling arthropods (including butterflies, moths and caterpillars) were surveyed by hand-netting along 30-m transects at each of five locations within set-aside strips in an intensive arable region, and six locations along irrigation canals and ditches in an extensively farmed region. Ground-dwelling arthropods (including caterpillars) were sampled for seven days using 15 pitfall traps next to each transect.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust