Study

Making sense of a prairie butterfly paradox: The effects of grazing, time since fire, and sampling period on regal fritillary abundance

  • Published source details Moranz R.A., Fuhlendorf S.D. & Engle D.M. (2014) Making sense of a prairie butterfly paradox: The effects of grazing, time since fire, and sampling period on regal fritillary abundance. Biological Conservation, 173, 32-41.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Increase grazing intensity or cutting frequency on grassland

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation

Use rotational burning

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Increase grazing intensity or cutting frequency on grassland

    A replicated, randomized, paired, controlled study in 2005–2007 in four tallgrass prairies in Missouri, USA (Moranz et al. 2014) found that increasing cattle grazing reduced the abundance of regal fritillary Speyeria idalia, particularly after recent burning. The number of regal fritillaries in grazed prairie (0–14 individuals/ha) was lower than in ungrazed prairie (1–25 individuals/ha) throughout the summer. However, the difference was greatest in prairies which had been burned earlier the same year (grazed: 0–2 individuals/ha; ungrazed: 3–22 individuals/ha). From 2000–2004, four remnant prairies were burned on rotation and occasionally hayed or lightly grazed. In 2005, half of each prairie was randomly assigned to one of two treatments: grazing and rotational burning, or rotational burning only. Each half was sub-divided into three plots (20–34 ha), which were randomly assigned to be burned in either March 2005, 2006 or 2007. The grazed sites were stocked with cattle (2.2 ha/animal unit) annually from April–August. From June–July 2006–2007, butterflies were surveyed three times/year on a transect through each plot.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

  2. Use rotational burning

    A replicated, randomized, paired, controlled study in 2005–2007 in four tallgrass prairies in Missouri, USA (Moranz et al. 2014) found that spring burning reduced regal fritillary Speyeria idalia abundance in mid-summer, but increased abundance later in the summer. In late June, the number of regal fritillaries in plots burned that spring (3–12 individuals/ha) was lower than in plots burned one (12–22 individuals/ha) or two (7–25 individuals/ha) years earlier. However, by late July, the number was higher in recently burned plots (14–22 individuals/ha) than in plots burned one or two years earlier (1–9 individuals/ha). In early June, fritillary abundance was not significantly different in recently burned plots (5–22 individuals/ha) and those burned in previous years (7–9 individuals/ha). From 2000–2004, four remnant prairies were burned on rotation and occasionally hayed or lightly grazed. In 2005, half of each prairie was randomly assigned to one of two treatments: grazing and rotational burning, or rotational burning only. Each half was sub-divided into three plots (20–34 ha), which were randomly assigned to be burned in either March 2005, 2006 or 2007. The grazed sites were stocked with cattle (2.2 ha/animal unit) annually from April–August. From June–July 2006–2007, butterflies were surveyed three times/year on a transect through each plot.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust