Study

No paternal genetic integration in desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) following translocation into an existing population

  • Published source details Mulder K.P., Walde A.D., Boarman W.I., Woodman A.P., Latch E.K. & Fleischer R.C. (2017) No paternal genetic integration in desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) following translocation into an existing population. Biological Conservation, 210, 318-324.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Translocate adult or juvenile reptiles: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Translocate adult or juvenile reptiles: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

    A replicated study in 2008–2012 in desert shrubland in California, USA (Mulder et al. 2017) found that some translocated Agassiz’s desert tortoises Gopherus agassizii survived at least 4 years in the wild and bred, but that all hatchlings tested, including those from resident females, were sired by resident and not translocated male tortoises. Four years after being released, at least 13 translocated female Agassiz’s desert tortoises were found to have laid eggs. Of 34 clutches laid by translocated and resident female Agassiz’s desert tortoises, none of 35 hatchlings tested were sired by translocated male Agassiz’s desert tortoises. In spring 2008, a total of 570 tortoises (184 females, 293 males, 93 juveniles) were translocated to a 1,000 km2 area, which already had a population of resident tortoises. In April–July 2012, clutches laid by translocated (13 individuals) and resident (21 individuals) female tortoises were located and hatchlings (35 individuals) tested to establish paternity by comparing DNA against a reference database (which included 190 resident males and 305/386 translocated adult and juvenile males). If no significant match with the database was found, the authors assumed that an unknown resident tortoise was the sire. Both translocated (31 individuals) and resident male tortoises (37 individuals) were known to frequent the study area.

    (Summarised by: Katie Sainsbury)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust