Study

Mitigation-driven translocation effects on temperature, condition, growth, and mortality of Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the face of solar energy development

  • Published source details Brand L.A., Farnsworth M.L., Meyers J., Dickson B.G., Grouios C., Scheib A.F. & Scherer R.D. (2016) Mitigation-driven translocation effects on temperature, condition, growth, and mortality of Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the face of solar energy development. Biological Conservation, 200, 104-111.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Translocate reptiles away from threats: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Translocate reptiles away from threats: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

    A controlled study in 2010–2014 in desert scrubland in southern California, USA (Brand et al. 2016) found that Mojave desert tortoises Gopherus agassizii translocated away from an energy plant and held in captivity for two years had similar annual mortality risk, but higher body temperatures in the first year after release, compared to wild resident tortoises. Mortality risk was similar between translocated tortoises (5% mortality/year) and wild resident tortoises (3–5% mortality/year). Translocated tortoises had higher average maximum daily body temperatures (36.8°C) compared to wild resident tortoises (35.9°C) in the first year after translocation and spent more time above 35°C (113 minutes) than resident tortoises (76–84 minutes). Translocated tortoise temperatures were similar to wild resident tortoises in the second and third year after translocation (see paper for details). In October 2010, tortoises were collected from near a thermal energy plant and maintained in captivity until April 2012, when they were released into an 8,798 ha area adjacent to the energy plant (<500 m from the centre of their previous home range). Translocated tortoise survival and body temperatures were compared to resident tortoises in the release area and resident tortoises from two nearby areas with similar habitat (resident tortoises caught for monitoring in spring–autumn 2011). All tortoises (351 total individuals) were radio-tracked in April–September 2012–2014 and a subset (55 translocated, 73 residents in release area, 87 nearby residents) were fitted with temperature loggers which were monitored between April 2012–September 2014.

    (Summarised by: Katie Sainsbury)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust