Conservation Evidence: Evidence Data

8855 Studies found

Studies

An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.

Review the associated Actions

About studies Sources of evidence

8855 Studies found

Refine

Hide

Refine

Keywords

Action type

Country

8855 Studies found

Order results by:

Sort by:

	Study	Published
	Artificial dispersal of endangered epiphytic lichens: a tool for conservation in boreal forest landscapes Based on: Liden M., Petterson M., Bergsten U. & Lundmark T. (2004). Study Link	2004
	Artificial dispersal as a restoration tool in meadows: sowing or planting? Based on: Wallin L., Svensson B.M. & Lönn M. (2009). Study Link	2009
	Artificial dens for raccoons Based on: Stuewer F.W. (1948). Study Link	1948
	Artificial cavity construction: an alternative to nest boxes Based on: Gano Jr R.D. & Mosher J.A. (1983). Study Link	1983
	Artificial burrows with basal chambers are preferred by pygmy bluetongue lizards, Tiliqua adelaidensis Based on: Staugas E.J., Fenner A.L., Ebrahimi M. & Bull C.M. (2013). Study Link	2013
	Artificial bird perches for the regeneration of degraded tropical peat swamp forest: a restoration tool with limited potential Based on: Graham L.L.B. & Page S.E. (2011). Study Link	2011
	Artificial bat roosts did not accelerate forest regeneration in abandoned pastures in southern Costa Rica Based on: Reid J.L., Holste E.K. & Zahawi R.A. (2013). Study Link	2013
	Artificial addition of snags and nest boxes to slash pine plantations Based on: Caine L.A. & Marion W.R. (1991). Study Link	1991
	Arthropods in grassy field margins in the Wieringermeer: Scope, population development and possible consequences for farm practice Based on: Canters K.J. & Tamis W.L.M. (1999). Study Link	1999
	Arthropod responses to experimental fire regimes in an Australian tropical savannah: Ordinal-level analysis Based on: Andersen A.N. & Müller W.J. (2000). Study Link	2000
	Arthropod reaction to landscape and habitat features in agricultural landscapes Based on: Jeanneret P., Schupbach B. & Pfiffner L. (2003). Study Link	2003
	Arthropod and plant communities as indicators of land rehabilitation effectiveness in a semi-arid shrub-steppe Based on: Gardner E.T., Anderson V.J. & Johnson R.L. (2009). Study Link	2009
	Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields Based on: Thomas C.F.G. & Marshall E.J.P. (1999). Study Link	1999
	Arid recovery - a comparison of reptile and small mammal populations inside and outside a large rabbit, cat and fox-proof exclosure in arid south Australia Based on: Moseby K.E., Hill B.M. & Read J.L. (2009). Study Link	2009
	Arid old-field restoration: Native perennial grasses suppress weeds and erosion, but also suppress native shrubs Based on: Porensky L.M., Leger E.A., Davison J., Miller W.W., Goergen E.M., Espeland E.K. & Carroll-Moore E.M. (2014). Study Link	2014
	Argentine ant management in cherimoyas Based on: Phillips P.A., Bekey R.S. & Goodall G.E. (1987). Study Link	1987
	Area-independent effects of water-retaining features on intertidal biodiversity on eco-engineered seawalls in the tropics Based on: Loke L.H.L., Heery E.C., Lai S., Bouma T.J. & Todd P.A. (2019). Study Link	2019
	Are vertical distribution patterns of scleractinian corals maintained by pre- or post-settlement processes? A case study of three contrasting species Based on: Mundy C. & Babcock R. (2000). Study Link	2000
	Are the same bears repeatedly translocated from corn crops in Wisconsin? Based on: Shivik J.A., Ruid D., Willging R.C. & Mock K.E. (2011). Study Link	2011
	Are sulfurous soil amendments (S₀, Fe(II)SO₄, Fe(III)SO₄) an effective tool in the restoration of heathland and acidic grassland after four decades of rock phosphate fertilization? Based on: Tibbett M. & Diaz A. (2005). Study Link	2005
	Are species listed in the Annex II of the Habitats Directive better represented in Natura 2000 network than the remaining species? A test using Spanish bats Based on: Lisón F., Sánchez-Fernández D. & Calvo J.F. (2015). Study Link	2015
	Are protected areas truly protected? The impact of road traffic on vertebrate fauna Based on: Garriga N., Santos X., Montori A., Richter-Boix À., Franch M. & Llorente G.A. (2012). Study Link	2012
	Are motorway passages worth building? Vertebrate use of road-crossing structures on a Spanish motorway Based on: Mata C., Hervàs I., Herranz J., Suàrez F. & Malo J.E. (2008). Study Link	2008
	Are marine protected areas useful for the recovery of the Mediterranean mussel populations? Based on: Rius M. & Zabala M. (2008). Study Link	2008
	*Are Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) control and eradication interventions effective? CEE Review 05-015* Based on: Kabat T.J., Stewart G.B. & Pullin A.S. (2006). Study Link	2006

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.