Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.
Review the associated Actions
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
0 selected |
|
Study | Published | |
---|---|---|
Attraction of little terns to artificial roof-top breeding sites and their breeding success 屋上営巣誘致に成功したコアジサシの繁殖状況について Based on: Hayashi E., Hayakawa M., Satou T. & Masuda N. (2002). Study Link |
2002 | |
Artificial propagation of tank-cultured Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) 水槽飼育した中国オオサンショウウオ(Andrias davidianus)の人工繁殖 Based on: Xiao H.B., Liu J.Y., Yang Y.Q. & Lang X.Z. (2006). Study Link |
2006 | |
Shelter effect of the gaps within rock piles to reduce the predation on Japanese eel Anguilla japonica 河川生活期のニホンウナギにおける浮き石による被食回避効果の検証 Based on: Sakanoue R., Satoh S., Matsushige K., Yasutake Y., Hibino Y., Manabe M., Utida K. & Mochioka N. (2021). Study Link |
2021 | |
Early vegetation growth in an experimental restoration site in the Watarase wetland 渡良瀬遊水地の湿地再生試験地における初期の植生発達 Based on: Ishii J., Hashimoto L. & Washitani I. (2011). Study Link |
2011 | |
A trial study on revegetation of the native Scirpus mariqueter population in the coastal wetland of the Yangtze Estuary 长江口滨海湿地原生海三棱藨草种群恢复的实验研究 Based on: Hu Z., Ma Q., Cao H., Zhang Z., Tang C., Zhang L. & Ge Z. (2016). Study Link |
2016 | |
The ecological effects of Suaeda salsa on repairing heavily degraded coastal saline-alkaline wetlands in the Yellow River Delta 黄河三角洲重度退化滨海湿地盐地碱蓬的生态修复效果 Based on: Guan B., Yu J., Lu Z., Xie W., Chen X. & Wang X. (2011). Study Link |
2011 |
0 selected |
|
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseAn online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 22
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continue