Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
3689 Actions found
Refine
Hide
3689 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Remove plant litter: brackish/salt marshes Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Add cover other than mulch before/after planting trees/shrubs: brackish/saline wetlands Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Rehabilitate reptiles following oil spills Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Legally protect habitat Action Link |
Evidence not assessed | 10 |
![]() |
|
Use netting to exclude fish-eating birds Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 6 |
![]() |
|
Provide nesting habitat for birds that is safe from extreme weather Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Engage volunteers to collect amphibian data (citizen science) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Change effluent treatments used in agriculture and forestry Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Log/remove trees within forests: effects on young trees Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Provide supplementary food for a certain period of time only Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 13 |
![]() |
|
Manage fertilizer or herbicide application near peatlands Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Educate farmers, land managers and local communities about the benefits of bats to improve management of bat habitats Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Protect habitat along elevational gradients Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use acoustic devices on fishing gear Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 33 |
![]() |
|
Remove plant litter: freshwater swamps Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Transplant wetland soil before/after planting non-woody plants: freshwater wetlands Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use non-ringed hooks Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Retain connectivity between habitat patches Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 3 |
![]() |
|
Disturb birds using foot patrols Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Remove vegetation to create nesting areas Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 6 |
![]() |
|
Clear vegetation Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 9 |
![]() |
|
Leave bat roosts and roost entrances unlit Action Link |
Beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Log/remove trees within forests: effects on understory plants Action Link |
Beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Provide supplementary food to primates through the establishment of prey populations Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Convert to organic agriculture or aquaculture near peatlands Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.