Conservation Evidence: Evidence Data

75 Actions found

Actions to conserve biodiversity

We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.

Review the evidence from the studies

About actions Sources of evidence

75 Actions found

Refine

Hide

Refine

Keywords

Threat

Action type

Land/water management
Land/water protection

Country

75 Actions found

Order results by:

Sort by:

Action	Effectiveness	Studies	Category
Other biodiversity: Exclude grazers Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	45	Synopsis Link
Soil: Use no tillage in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	40	Synopsis Link
Soil: Use reduced tillage in arable fields Action Link	Beneficial	40	Synopsis Link
Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields Action Link	Beneficial	29	Synopsis Link
Crop production: Use reduced tillage in arable fields Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	26	Synopsis Link
Soil: Use organic fertilizer instead of inorganic Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	26	Synopsis Link
Crop production: Grow cover crops in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be ineffective or harmful	25	Synopsis Link
Soil: Add compost to the soil Action Link	Beneficial	24	Synopsis Link
Other biodiversity: Restore habitat along watercourses Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	24	Synopsis Link
Crop production: Use no tillage in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be ineffective or harmful	23	Synopsis Link
Soil: Plant or maintain ground cover in orchards or vineyards Action Link	Beneficial	22	Synopsis Link
Water: Plant or maintain ground cover in orchards or vineyards Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	21	Synopsis Link
Soil: Use no tillage instead of reduced tillage Action Link	Unlikely to be beneficial	20	Synopsis Link
Water: Grow cover crops in arable fields Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	19	Synopsis Link
Pest regulation: Grow cover crops in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	19	Synopsis Link
Other biodiversity: Use grazers to manage vegetation Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	18	Synopsis Link
Water: Use reduced tillage in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	17	Synopsis Link
Crop production: Use no tillage instead of reduced tillage Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	15	Synopsis Link
Water: Use no tillage in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be beneficial	15	Synopsis Link
Crop production: Plant or maintain ground cover in orchards or vineyards Action Link	Likely to be ineffective or harmful	14	Synopsis Link
Soil: Add slurry to the soil Action Link	Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)	14	Synopsis Link
Soil: Use crop rotations Action Link	Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)	14	Synopsis Link
Pest regulation: Plant or maintain ground cover in orchards or vineyards Action Link	Trade-off between benefit and harms	13	Synopsis Link
Other biodiversity: Use fewer grazers Action Link	Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)	12	Synopsis Link
Pest regulation: Use no tillage in arable fields Action Link	Likely to be ineffective or harmful	12	Synopsis Link

Mediterranean Farmland - Published 2017

Download PDF View PDF

Mediterranean Farmland synopsis

All synopses About synopses Synopsis protocols Synopsis advisory board

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.