Catalogue of Conservation Reports:
Results from Systematic Searches
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
288 studies found
Refine
Hide
288 studies found
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Study | Published | |
---|---|---|
Marine mammals and salmon bag-nets Based on: Harris R.N. (2012) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, Marine Scotland and Scottish National Heritage, 31pp. |
2012 | |
Long term effectiveness of an acoustic deterrent for seals in the Kyle of Sutherland Based on: Harris R.N. (2011) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, SMRU, UK, Report to Scottish Government. Study Link |
2011 | |
Seals and wild salmon fisheries (SSI Year 1) Based on: Harris R.N. & Northridge S. (2016) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, Report to Scottish Government SSI. Study Link |
2016 | |
Marine mammal research at wild salmon fisheries: Annual Report for 2013 Based on: Harris R.N., Fowden D., Froude M. & Northridge S. (2014) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, Seal and Salmon Research Project: report to Scottish Government and Scottish National Heritage, 29pp. Study Link |
2014 | |
Assessing the nature and use of corvid cage traps in Scotland: Part 2 of 4 - Field survey of trap use in Scotland 2014-2015 Based on: Hartley F.G., Campbell S.T. & Jamieson S. (2016) NatureScot report, no. 932. |
2016 | |
Conservation of the freshwater pearl mussel I: Captive breeding techniques - Conserving Natura 2000 rivers Based on: Hastie L.C. & Young M.R. (2003) Natural England report, Conservation Techniques Series No. 2 (IN127). |
2003 | |
Quantifying the effects of Entry Level Stewardship (ELS) on biodiversity at the farm scale: The Hillesden Experiment Based on: Heard M.S., Botham M., Broughton R., Carvell C., Hinsley S., Woodcock B., Pywell R.F., Amy S., Bellamy P.E., Hill R.A., Hulmes S., Hulmes L., Meek W.R., Nowakowski M., Peyton J., Redhead J.W., Shore R.F. & Turk A. (2011) Natural England report, CEH report to Natural England, no. MA01031 (Project:RP00026). Study Link |
2011 | |
The eradication of ruddy ducks in the United Kingdom Based on: Henderson I. (2010) IUCN Invasive Species Bulletin report, 29, 17. |
2010 | |
Changes in farmland bird abundance at Colworth 2000-2006 Based on: Henderson I.G., Clark N. & Holloway S. (2007) British Trust for Ornithology report, BTO Research Report 457. |
2007 | |
The Colworth Sustainable Project: The response of birds, invertebrates and plants to crop structure and management manipulations on arable farmland Based on: Henderson I.G., Holloway S. & Clark N. (2003) British Trust for Ornithology report, BTO Research Report 313, 67pp. |
2003 | |
The relative abundance of birds on farmland in relation to game-cover and winter bird crop Based on: Henderson I.G., Vickery J.A. & Carter N. (2001) British Trust for Ornithology report, BTO Research Report 275. |
2001 | |
A survey of selected agri-environmental grassland creation and restoration sites Based on: Hewins E. (2013) Natural England report, Natural England Commissioned Report 107. |
2013 | |
Habitat restoration project Sherwood Forest Based on: Hewson G. & Scott C. (2000) Natural England (English Nature) report, English Nature Research Report 367 by Sherwood Forest Trust, 55pp. |
2000 | |
Sand lizard surveys at Newborough Warren NNR and sand dune habitat management guidance Based on: Hill P., Moulton N. & Foster J. (2018) Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (ARC) report, Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust; Natural Resources Wales Evidence Report No. 302. |
2018 | |
Lapwings on agri-environment scheme fallow plots: Research to improve lapwing breeding success Based on: Hoodless A. & MacDonald M. (2014) Natural England report, Final Report to DEFRA/Natural England (RP00920), (Project BD5211). |
2014 | |
Sustainable management systems for unimproved neutral grassland Based on: Institute of Grassland and Environment Research (IGER) & North Wyke Research (2013) Natural England report, Final Report to DEFRA/Natural England (DEFRA Project BD1460; Report: RP00200). |
2013 | |
A conservation literature review for the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) Based on: Inter-Agency Marine Mammal Working Group (IAMMWG), Camphuysen C.J. & Siemensma M.L. (2015) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 566. |
2015 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–5 February 2016, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2016) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2016, 82pp. |
2016 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 4–7 February 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2014) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2014, 96pp. |
2014 | |
Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME), 6–9 February 2017, St Andrews, Scotland, UK Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2017) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGMME Expert Report 2017, 102pp. |
2017 | |
Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME), 27–30 March 2007, Vilm, Germany Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2007) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGMME Expert Report 2007, 61pp. |
2007 | |
Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2018) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2018, 128pp. |
2018 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC 2012), Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2012) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2012, 67pp. |
2012 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 2-6 February 2015, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2015) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2015, 82pp. |
2015 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 4–8 February 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2013) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2013, 73pp. |
2013 |
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseThe Conservation Evidence Journal
An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Discover more on our blog
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
Go to the Conservation Evidence blog
Who uses Conservation Evidence?
Meet some of the evidence champions
For a full list of, and information about, our champions:
All Evidence ChampionsAbout our champions, why and how to become one:
Become an Evidence ChampionThis website uses Cookies
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continue1 Select a category
- Birds
- Marshes and Swamps
- Reptiles
- Terrestrial Mammals
- Subtidal benthic invertebrates
- Bats
- Marine and Freshwater Mammals
- Control of Freshwater Invasive Species
- Primates
- Amphibians
- Peatlands
- Butterflies and moths
- Forest
- Farmland
- Shrublands and Heathlands
- Captive Animals
- Marine fish
- Mediterranean Farmland
- Bees
- Marine artificial structures
- Grassland
- Soils
- Aquaculture
- Natural Pest Control
2 Refine category
3 View actions
What concerns you?
Fields with * are required.
Letters are not case-sensitive.