Catalogue of Conservation Reports:
Results from Systematic Searches
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
288 studies found
Refine
Hide
288 studies found
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Study | Published | |
---|---|---|
A review of the influence of ombrotrophic peat depth on the successful restoration of bog habitat Based on: Lindsay R.A. & Clough J. (2016) NatureScot report, no. 925. |
2016 | |
Ecosystem effects of woodland exclosures Based on: Mitchell R.J., Lilly A., Bell J.S., Cameron C., Donald C., Fielding D., Green G., Hewison R.H., McIntyre S., Newman G., Nolan A., Owen J., Smith D., Sturgeon F., Thompson C., Towers W. & Williams E. (2019) NatureScot report, no. 971. |
2019 | |
Resolution 2.12 Guidelines for the use of acoustic deterrent devices. Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area (ACCOBAMS) Based on: ACCOBAMS . (2004) ACCOBAMS report. |
2004 | |
Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME), 27–30 March 2007, Vilm, Germany Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2007) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGMME Expert Report 2007, 61pp. |
2007 | |
Review of methods used to reduce risks of cetacean bycatch and entanglements 2018 Based on: Leaper R. & Calderan S. (2018) Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) report, CMS Technical Series No. 38. |
2018 | |
A summary of the impacts of ash dieback on UK biodiversity, including the potential for long-term monitoring and further research on management scenarios Based on: Lawrence R. & Cheffings C.M. (2014) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 501. |
2014 | |
Tests of acoustic signals for aversive sound mitigation with harbour seals Based on: Gordon J., Blight C., Bryant E. & Thompson D. (2015) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, Marine Mammal Scientific Support Research Programme: SMRU Report to Scottish Government MR 8.1, 35pp. |
2015 | |
Towards an assessment of the state of UK peatlands Based on: Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) (2011) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 445. |
2011 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–5 February 2016, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2016) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2016, 82pp. |
2016 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC 2012), Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2012) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2012, 67pp. |
2012 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 2-6 February 2015, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2015) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2015, 82pp. |
2015 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 4–7 February 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2014) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2014, 96pp. |
2014 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 4–8 February 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2013) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2013, 73pp. |
2013 | |
Report of the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 12–15 June 2017, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2017) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2017, 82pp. |
2017 | |
Report of the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME), 6–9 February 2017, St Andrews, Scotland, UK Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2017) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGMME Expert Report 2017, 102pp. |
2017 | |
Implementation of and consideration for revisions to the JNCC guidelines for seismic surveys Based on: Stone C.J. (2015) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 463b. |
2015 | |
Management of Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the arctic Atlantic Based on: Øystein W., Erik W.B. & Robert E.A.S. (2014) North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO) report, no. 9, 315-341. |
2014 | |
Marine mammal observations during seismic surveys from 1994 - 2010 Based on: Stone C.J. (2015) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 463a. |
2015 | |
Plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks in UK waters Based on: Fowler S., Mogensen C.B. & Blasdale T. (2004) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 360. |
2004 | |
Report from the Working Group on Bycatch of Protected Species (WGBYC), 1–4 May 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland Based on: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) (2018) International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) report, ICES WGBYC Expert Report 2018, 128pp. |
2018 | |
Harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and rehabilitation Based on: Nynke O. (2010) North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO) report, NAMMCO Scientific Publications 8, 355–372. |
2010 | |
Bycatch of marine turtles in UK and Irish waters Based on: Pierpoint C. (2000) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 310. |
2000 | |
A conservation framework for hen harriers in the United Kingdom Based on: Fielding A., Haworth P., Whitfield P., McLeod D. & Riley H. (2011) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 411. |
2011 | |
A conservation literature review for the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) Based on: Inter-Agency Marine Mammal Working Group (IAMMWG), Camphuysen C.J. & Siemensma M.L. (2015) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 566. |
2015 | |
Decision-making guidance for managing Phytophthora infections in Vaccinium myrtillus populations Based on: Bunch N., Cheffings C. & Robinson A. (2016) Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) report, no. 578. |
2016 |
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseThe Conservation Evidence Journal
An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Discover more on our blog
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
Go to the Conservation Evidence blog
Who uses Conservation Evidence?
Meet some of the evidence champions
For a full list of, and information about, our champions:
All Evidence ChampionsAbout our champions, why and how to become one:
Become an Evidence ChampionThis website uses Cookies
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continue1 Select a category
- Birds
- Marshes and Swamps
- Reptiles
- Terrestrial Mammals
- Subtidal benthic invertebrates
- Bats
- Marine and Freshwater Mammals
- Control of Freshwater Invasive Species
- Primates
- Amphibians
- Peatlands
- Butterflies and moths
- Forest
- Farmland
- Shrublands and Heathlands
- Captive Animals
- Marine fish
- Mediterranean Farmland
- Bees
- Marine artificial structures
- Grassland
- Soils
- Aquaculture
- Natural Pest Control
2 Refine category
3 View actions
What concerns you?
Fields with * are required.
Letters are not case-sensitive.