Stabilize riverbanks
-
Overall effectiveness category Evidence not assessed
-
Number of studies: 1
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
-
Effectiveness
not assessed -
Certainty
not assessed -
Harms
not assessed
Study locations
Supporting evidence from individual studies
A controlled, before-and-after study in 2014–2017 in a river in Southland, New Zealand (Holmes et al. 2019) found that after stabilizing riverbanks by creating a shallower slope, longfin eel Anguilla dieffenbachii biomass decreased after the first year but reached similar levels to before stabilization after 2–3 years. Average eel biomass decreased by 49% one year after stabilizing the riverbanks (5 g/m2) compared to two months before (9 g/m2). Average eel biomass did not differ significantly two (6 g/m2) and three years (11 g/m2) after riverbank stabilization compared to two months before. Meanwhile, over the same period in unmodified streams, eel biomass increased by 160% from two months before (12 g/m2) to one year after (32 g/m2) but did not differ significantly after two (11 g/m2) and three years (9 g/m2). In March 2014, three 40-m river sections that had previously been straightened were stabilized by reducing the angle of both banks to a 1:2 slope. Three 40-m unmodified river sections 4 km upstream were used as a comparison. A total of 432 eels were caught by electrofishing within stop-nets (6-mm mesh) over four 5-day periods: two months before and for three years after (2015–2017) stabilizing.
Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats