Use ‘mammal-safe’ nets to capture and release mammals trapped in fishing structures
-
Overall effectiveness category Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)
-
Number of studies: 1
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
-
Effectiveness
-
Certainty
-
Harms
Study locations
Supporting evidence from individual studies
A controlled study in 1992–2001 at coastal fishing sites in the Bay of Fundy, Canada (Neimanis et al. 2004) found that using specialised ‘marine mammal nets’ with a large mesh size to release harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena from herring weirs resulted in lower porpoise mortality compared to when conventional nets were used. Overall porpoise mortality rates were lower when released from weirs with ‘marine mammal nets’ (6 of 240 porpoises, 3%) than with conventional herring nets (44 of 239 porpoises, 18%). Porpoises trapped in herring weirs were captured and released using two types of purse-seine net: ‘marine mammal nets’ (buoyant polypropylene with mesh size 7.5 cm; 240 porpoises) and conventional herring nets (mesh size 0.75–1.25 cm; 239 porpoises). Herring weirs (comprising 1-cm nylon mesh strung between wooden stakes in a kidney-shape, 3–20 m deep) were built near the shore to catch Atlantic herring Clupea harengus. Trapped porpoises were enclosed within the purse-seine nets, transferred to boats and released outside of the weirs. Researchers recorded porpoise deaths during each of the 479 release attempts in 1992–2001.
Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation - Published 2021
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Synopsis