Use a smaller beam trawl
-
Overall effectiveness category Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence)
-
Number of studies: 1
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
-
Effectiveness
-
Certainty
-
Harms
Study locations
Supporting evidence from individual studies
A replicated, paired, controlled study in 1992-1995 in four areas of silty or sandy seabed in the south-eastern North Sea, Netherlands and Germany (Bergman & Van Santbrink 2000) found that using a smaller beam trawl caused similar mortality of invertebrates in the trawl tracks compared to using a larger beam trawl. Mortality using a 4-m beam trawl varied between 2 to 80% depending on species, similar to a 12-m beam trawl (1–82% mortality). Mortality did not differ across sediment type (sandy or silty). In spring-summer 1992–1995, parallel strips (2,000 x 60 m, 300 m apart, number unspecified) in one sandy location and three silty locations were fished with either a 12-m (commercially used) or 4-m beam trawl (both with tickler chains). Prior to trawling, mega-invertebrates (>1 cm) and macro-invertebrates (>1 mm) were counted from samples taken from each strip using a dredge and a sediment grab. After 24–48 h following trawling, all strips were sampled again using the same methods. Mortality (from trawling) of invertebrates present in the trawl tracks was calculated using the difference between the before and after-trawling abundances (assuming all animals killed by trawling had been eaten by predators).
Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:
Subtidal Benthic Invertebrate Conservation