Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - carfentrazone-ethyl
-
Overall effectiveness category Likely to be beneficial
-
Number of studies: 5
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
-
Effectiveness
-
Certainty
-
Harms
Study locations
Supporting evidence from individual studies
A small, replicated, controlled, before-and-after, laboratory study conducted in 2003 in the USA (Glomski et al. 2006), found that the application of the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl reduced growth in parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum but did not lead to plant death. After 28 days, the biomass of parrot’s feather shoots treated with carfentrazone-ethyl was 29.5–54% lower than untreated plants. However, emerged and submerged foliage remained viable. The study was carried out using 12 1,600 l containers filled with water, each of which contained eight 5 l containers with three 15 cm parrot’s feather stems. Each of the three tested herbicide rates (50, 100 and 200 μg/l) was applied to three 1600 l containers, and plants in three containers were left untreated. Plants from four of the eight 5 l plastic containers placed inside each 1600 l container were harvested, dried and weighed before herbicide application, and the remaining plants were harvested, dried and weighed 28 days after herbicide application.
Study and other actions testedA small, replicated, randomized, controlled, laboratory study conducted in 2004 in the USA (Gray et al. 2007), found that the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl reduced growth in parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. After three weeks, young parrot’s feather plants treated with carfentrazone-ethyl had a lower dry weight (1.8–2.4 g/pot) than untreated plants (6.4–10 g/pot). Parrot’s feather shoots were propagated in 3.9 l plastic containers. Carfentrazone-ethyl application rate ranged between 100 and 200 μg/l and each herbicide rate was applied to three plants.
Study and other actions testedA small, replicated, controlled, laboratory study conducted in the USA (Richardson et al. 2008), found that the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl reduced growth in parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. Parrot’s feather plants treated with carfentrazone-ethyl had a lower dry weight (0.55–0.88 g) than untreated plants (1.43 g). Parrot’s feather shoot tips (5–10 cm) were transplanted into 9 cm2 pots. Carfentrazone-ethyl application rate ranged between 56 and 224 g/ha and each herbicide rate was applied to pots with three plants and plants in one pot were left unsprayed. Dates of the studies are not presented.
Study and other actions testedA small, replicated, randomized, controlled, laboratory study conducted in 2006 in the USA (Wersal et al. 2010), found that the application of the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl reduced growth in parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. After four weeks, the dry weight of parrot’s feather plants treated with carfentrazone-ethyl was lower than untreated plants (1–2.1 vs 4.6 g/pot). Daytime and night-time application of the herbicide resulted in similar results. Parrot’s feather shoots were propagated in 3.78 l pots and placed inside 246 l containers filled with water. Each herbicide rate (0.1 and 0.2 mg/l) was applied to three plants.
Study and other actions testedA small, replicated, controlled, laboratory study conducted between 2007 and 2008 in the USA (Wersal & Madsen 2010) found that the application of the herbicide carfentrazone-ethyl reduced growth of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. After six weeks, the dry weight of parrot’s feather plants treated with carfentrazone-ethyl was lower (10–12 g/pot) than that of untreated plants (18 g/pot). Six weeks after application, plants treated with carfentrazone-ethyl were reduced by 0–15% (visual assessment with 0% corresponding to no reduction in cover relative to untreated plans and 100% to complete elimination). Parrot’s feather shoots were propagated in 3.78 l pots and placed inside 246 l containers filled with water. Each herbicide rate (0.1 and 0.2 mg/l) was applied to four 246 l containers, each holding four plants. Number of plants used as control is not presented.
Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:
Control of Freshwater Invasive SpeciesControl of Freshwater Invasive Species - Published 2017
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species Synopsis